Flight Test Safety Fact 25-03
Sometimes I ponder the “days of yore” and the way scientists of the time corresponded in writing, together with the ad hoc postal system of the day. Today, we correspond by email in near real time. I say “near real time” because who among us responds that quickly to all of our emails?!
This month, three readers have corresponded with us by sharing their letters to the editor and their ideas, with you. This month is one of my favorite kinds of FTSF.
I hope you will respond. Perhaps you have an idea that differs from my idea (github) of crowdsourcing flight test mishap data, that differs from Chia’s idea (AI/LLM) of aggregating flight test content, or Hunter’s idea (the author of the first L2tE).
Maybe your thoughts mirror Mike’s thoughts about an SETP talk or the way the topic of the presentation illuminated your own experience, highlighted the deeper meaning beneath something you did but weren’t quite sure why. He wrote the second L2tE.
Or there’s a chance that you want to speak up about the impact of someone’s intellectual legacy, the shadow it cast on your way of thinking—the effect Sandy’s article had on me. His was the third.
There are many ways to do this, but here are three suggestions: 1) emailing us with your feedback; 2) email the authors directly (do you know how very meaningful that is?); 3) print out the newsletter and share it with someone in your office.
We hope you enjoy it and that it makes you think—send an email to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. if it does.
Sincerely,
Mark Jones Jr.
Editor
PS For added security you can download the pdf here.